home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!usenet
- From: Paul Kenneth Egell-johnsen <paulken4@afrodite.kih.no>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: PPC 603 vs. PPC 604
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 15:13:47 +0100
- Organization: UNINETT news service
- Message-ID: <3151641B.1594@afrodite.kih.no>
- References: <4if6s4$rmo@news.flinet.com> <1334.6651T122T1032@burst.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: afrodite.kih.no
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.05 9000/720)
-
- Lee Huggett wrote:
-
- > Not the 603, 603e or the 604 but the 620 is...
- >
- > Apparently the 604 isn't much more than the 603, a few dollars if that in
- > bulk, I hope AT use these babies instead of the 603 series...
- >
- > I was reading in Mac format (I found it...) that Apple got into problems using
- > the 603s (the 601 was faster) and switched to the 603e....
- >
- > I hope AT hasn't been palmed off with the old 603s
-
- Isn't there a 604e too? And when it comes to the e models aren't
- they faster (as in due to better technology and design) and more
- power efficient?
-
- I hope AT goes for the latest and best, and the signals I have
- received says that there will be options for faster processors
- for those who want them...
-
- But then one may only hope and pray that the motherboard and
- memory are made such as to take advantage of future technology
- and not beeing locked to the current (ie. 64 bit paths and such,
- not 32 bits, modular design etc.)...
-
- Paul K Egell-Johnsen,
-
- mailto:paulken4@afrodite.kih.no
- http://afrodite.kih.no:8001/studenter/paulken4/frames/
-